![]() “Atmos for home in films has only 1 bed channel in LFE and usually 11 dynamic objects. (this means that it’s 128 distinct channels, although the bed channels are what you normally think about as old school channels and the remaining 118 channels has additional metadata to position them in 3D space) “Dolby Atmos in theaters has a 9.1 "bed" channels for ambience stems or center dialogue, leaving 118 tracks for objects.” The first paragraph of that Wikipedia article in the Trchnology section is clearer It sounds better than a movie theater to me when it comes to loudness and how encompassing it is. To me it sounds amazing and I have the 3 front channels amped on there own. I’ve never owned a home theater prior to the one I have now so I have no base line. And last the 5 channel listening test is almost impossible to tell any differences cause the sound is coming from everywhere and just melds together. ![]() add a second speaker for stereo and it’s even worse. ![]() Second, Amir just released his speaker review review and even stated without listening to one speaker it makes it very difficult to notice what you have. However I can’t say and this was mentioned previously that you would even be able to spot out the differences even on blind testing the receivers. Yes denon is better but it seems most of these units whether it’s separates or all in one seem to have poor performance on paper. Like I mentioned I don’t think there’s a huge difference between many of these units. I have L plates for this topic, so hopefully others can enrich us both.Ĭlick to expand.The Emotiva TMC-1 is basically the same price and has 16 channels of processing and better measurements. I don't think DA throttles down to 8 channels and then back up to more: rather, it maps to however many your setup and AVR tech can process. OTOH the limited processors in AVRs have led to some limited DA applications for HT, despite the fact that Atmos in home theatres can support 24.1.10 channels. You might be thinking of the fact that DA can be used to play through conventional surround sound HT layouts like 5.1 and 7.1, with or without height speakers added, but I don't think that is how it is defined or limited. The home movie audio is basically all object data. ![]() The language is different to what we are familiar with: for example, for home movies, only one bed channel is used and 11 object tracks. Then, depending on whether the application is theatre, home theatre or game, a different number of bed channels plus object tracks is made available. You can start in the studio with up to 128 tracks, plus spatial metadata. I guess basic is a relative term when that means supporting a multitude of constantly evolving audio and video formats.īut just maybe, if they simplified the receiver's feature set they'd have more time to spend on improving the specs? Personally, I don't need many of these features so I wish they would "dumb" down the features and produce a box that measures at state of art levels AND was much more basic. can it play Napster ?), how the product looks, and "will it work" with my speakers" and TV are the main questions at the BestBuy.īu, if you want a processor with balanced outputs, and with all of the features that this 8805a has built in, what are the choices? Not saying I agree that better specs wouldn't be nicer, but the feature set stuffed into this box is phenomenal - even if it cost $5000.00. This site helps to make an informed buying decision with great information but other than people on this site, what percent of AVR buyers care about SINAD or the DAC's filter? Features (i.e.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |